Popular Post

ipod touch 2g cases

Tuesday, May 24, 2011
ipod touch 2g cases. ipod touch 2g cases. case.
  • ipod touch 2g cases. case.



  • OS2toMAC
    Mar 22, 03:55 PM
    With the shortages of iPad2's out there, and international sales about to start up, probably making it worse, if the Xoom, G Tabs and Playbooks are "close enough" (particularly for folks that are not avid Apple followers), they could get quite a few sales. At least that is my opinion. (And like everyone I have an @$$-hole too.):)





    ipod touch 2g cases. Speck ipod touch 2g case
  • Speck ipod touch 2g case



  • CJM
    Jul 20, 12:35 PM
    You realize there are probably only four people on this board who are old enough to get that joke, right?

    My "vote" goes for "Hex" - "The Mac Hex. Buy one and see." Then again, maybe not.

    16 here, but I still get it :p

    Come on, some Mac fans do a little research now and again :P





    ipod touch 2g cases. ipod touch 2g cases.
  • ipod touch 2g cases.



  • Mattie Num Nums
    Apr 19, 02:46 PM
    Are you talking about the Newton, troll?

    http://www.thocp.net/hardware/pictures/pda/apple_newton_sml.jpg

    I had a Casio Personal Diary in the late 80's that had the exact same grid.

    Im not a troll either without Apple I wouldn't have a job.





    ipod touch 2g cases. for your iPod touch 2G.
  • for your iPod touch 2G.



  • mpolda
    Jun 23, 02:38 PM
    I just got a call from the manager of the Radio Shack I placed my preorder at. Even though I was first in line I'm being told I won't be getting my phone tomorrow. They screwed up the sku's and oversold the phones. This is a company-wide problem. He couldn't tell me when I'd be receiving it. I called the district manager and they're looking into it, but didn't have any additional info.





    ipod touch 2g cases. the iPod touch 2G in its case,
  • the iPod touch 2G in its case,



  • Sydde
    Mar 22, 08:47 PM
    What I always wonder is what diplomatic efforts were used to pressure Qaddafi? There were no (as far as I know) threats of economic embargoes, freezing of assets, or other less violent methods to coerce Qaddafi.

    As I recall, there was some freezing of the assets (http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/feb/27/gaddafi-family-assets-frozen-queen), though the figures they show make it look like little more than window dressing.

    Really, the reason the west wants him outta there is because no one can agree on how to transliterate his name :confused:





    ipod touch 2g cases. case for iPod touch 2G is
  • case for iPod touch 2G is



  • MattyMac
    Aug 11, 11:09 AM
    Yes Yes Yes





    ipod touch 2g cases. iPod Touch 2G Cases
  • iPod Touch 2G Cases



  • addicted44
    Mar 31, 02:31 PM
    Doesn't mean he's not right on this one.

    He's moved to the Anger stage, after entering the Denial stage on the Honeycomb fiasco.





    ipod touch 2g cases. cool ipod touch 2g cases. ipod
  • cool ipod touch 2g cases. ipod



  • ezekielrage_99
    Sep 18, 11:33 PM
    For the love of God, please, learn to spell.

    It's just not the spelling it's the grammatical errors in general as well.





    ipod touch 2g cases. Buy Now middot; Griffin
  • Buy Now middot; Griffin



  • milo
    Jul 20, 10:12 AM
    Anyone else think this is getting out of hand? Two cores, great improvement. Four cores, ehh it's faster but Joe can't tell. Eight cores, now thats just stupid.

    No way. It would be stupid for a web surfing machine. But for people who need the power, they're going to absolutely notice when it does things TWICE as fast. I say bring it on (and I'm running a quad and see a *huge* difference).





    ipod touch 2g cases. cases – your iPod touch
  • cases – your iPod touch



  • Westside guy
    Mar 22, 01:05 PM
    Ugh. When and if I buy a tablet, I don't intend to limit my consideration to just the iPad - but displaying pre-release hardware that doesn't even function yet is just silly. That's a Microsoft-ish move - it may excite the tech press, but customers aren't going to care unless they can see the darn thing run!

    I must admit I'm a bit put off by what appears to be a consistent unwillingness by hardware manufacturers to provide software upgrades for their existing Android devices.





    ipod touch 2g cases. Buy Now middot; Griffin
  • Buy Now middot; Griffin



  • KingYaba
    Aug 27, 10:45 AM
    Maybe an x1800. We all just have to wait and see. :)





    ipod touch 2g cases. cool ipod touch 2g cases. ipod
  • cool ipod touch 2g cases. ipod



  • mashinhead
    Aug 20, 06:25 PM
    Yeah, now all we have to do is be able to afford it. Wonder what the price point on tigerton or clovertown is going to be.

    Yeah thats what i want to know. Because right now i have a dual-core powermac. I'm interested in this mac pro now, if i have huge upgradability options in the future, and also depending on price. I can wait til january, but if all that will happen by then is that there will be a 1K bto clovertown/kentsfield bto, I probably couldn't afford that anyway, and don't want to wait, but if they are going to upgrade everything, to the octo-core chip and prices are around the same, even if they increase, i would wait.





    ipod touch 2g cases. iPod Touch 2G, iPod Touch
  • iPod Touch 2G, iPod Touch



  • xxBURT0Nxx
    Apr 9, 09:45 AM
    I don't think 2IS is getting that IF Intel allowed Nvidia to continue making sandy bridge chipsets, Nvidia could've easily integrated a 320m successor into the south bridge. This would give you the best of both worlds, the downclocked Low-voltage Intel HD graphics when on battery or basic surfing, or the 320m successor in the south bridge when playing games or aperture photo editing. All this WITHOUT raising the motherboard chip count that putting a separate discrete (on it's own, not integrated into the chipset like 320m) would entail.

    I thought the 320m was also integrated? Wouldn't that mean that would be your only graphics card were nvidia allowed to add them to sandy bridge? I don't see why you would have integrated intel hd 3000 along with an integrated 320m (or successor).





    ipod touch 2g cases. Blue Snap-On Hard Case Back
  • Blue Snap-On Hard Case Back



  • firestarter
    Apr 5, 06:32 PM
    Time for my 8 cores to start all being used at the same time.

    ++, finally!


    I'm hoping they sell it on the App store. I prefer the licensing management and model on there. (Although 50GB might be a problem!!)





    ipod touch 2g cases. iPod Touch 2G Cases
  • iPod Touch 2G Cases



  • BillyShears
    Aug 7, 09:32 PM
    all the pictures i've seen of leopard show a unified interface :D

    Safari appears to be brushed metal. Go here (http://www.apple.com/macosx/leopard/dashboard.html) and go to about 1/6 of the way through.





    ipod touch 2g cases. iPod Touch 2G Leather Case
  • iPod Touch 2G Leather Case



  • Hellhammer
    Dec 5, 03:30 AM
    hahe same here.. though i was close on the first alfa and rally challenge but the ferrari one: 1st corner you are first place and then you can just finish the race 'safe' but the lambo one... what a PITA .. it even spined out on me in a fast corner just because i went off the throttle slightly
    i already took a mental note to avoid _that_ lambo for the challenge

    Come on, Lambos are the best! :p It just requires some learning and tuning of the breaks. Love my 841hp Murcielago ;)





    ipod touch 2g cases. nano 4G and iPod touch 2G
  • nano 4G and iPod touch 2G



  • cult hero
    Mar 26, 12:19 AM
    I'm really not looking forward to Lion at all. It just seems like a huge step backwards for those of us that use our computers as real computers and not toys.

    I use my computer as a "real computer" and I like virtually every change I've seen. I wish people wouldn't generalize so broadly and presume that because certain additions aren't something that they use that it has nothing to do with "real work."

    I LOATH the whole idea of merging OSX and iOS, they shouldn't even be related.

    Why shouldn't they be related? Borrowing concepts and sharing library isn't the same as being merged. The only people who honestly believe the OSes are being merged into one are the paranoid people on this forum.

    I hate how they are ruining expose, I really don't want my stuff groups by app, I want to see every window like it is now.

    Unless I'm missing something, Mission Control is added in addition to Expos� as it is now. The old functionality will still be there. As for it being "ruined," a couple of days before the Lion preview the graphic artist I work with most was describing changes he wished they'd make to Expos� and we were laughing together a few days later when we watched the preview and boom, there it was. Incidentally, he makes his living off what he does with his "real" computer.

    I have no use for "full screen" apps, why would I waste all my screen real estate only showing one thing at a time?

    Cool. Don't use "full screen apps." However, they make a lot of sense in a few places. Paired with Spaces I'm looking forward to this when working on my laptop without an external monitor. Also, on a multimonitor setup it makes a lot of sense.

    I hate the idea of getting programs through the app store on the Mac, I refuse to do that. I hate all the gesture crap going on, sure it's fine for laptop users, but it's of no use to me on my mac pro.

    Again, don't do any of it. I've been using Steam for my games on the PC basically since CounterStrike: Condition Zero was released. It's awesome. I was thrilled with the AppStore for similar reasons. It's just convenient. However, it's not the only distribution method available for software so its existence doesn't impede you.

    I also use my trackpad when using my computer like a desktop and love having my Expos� gestures there.


    I think all this is just a dumbing down of what is an amazing OS.

    What's being dumbed down exactly? Ease of use is very different than "dumbing down." Workflows that aren't what one particular individual likes are not "dumb." There are plenty of UNIX fanatics that think people using anything but CLI for half their workflow are using "dumbed down" interfaces. They're wrong and they're annoying.

    I don't use my mac with dual displays anything like I'd use an iPad, so why put that crap in there? I just don't like the direction they are taking OSX in general, and I doubt I will upgrade from snow leopard. To me this is very sad news, the day OSX and iOS merge is the day the mac dies.

    Launchpad is, in my opinion, the lamest and most unnecessary addition to Lion. However, it's so minor that I don't care. I know some people will really like it. I am not personally offended by the inclusion of a feature I don't use or care about either.

    The vast majority of people using computers are not techies, pros or developers. They're people like my parents. As a developer, I'm generally more excited about a new release of XCode than I am about OS X because overall, it's going to affect what I do far more than the OS will.

    To me this is very sad news, the day OSX and iOS merge is the day the mac dies.

    If they merge in the sense that the Mac becomes as locked down as an iPhone, I agree that that's it on Macs and even if they don't die in the market from Apple's would be hubris I'll be leaving Apple for something else. Thankfully, this will only occur if most of Apple's leadership is replaced with an army of complete morons.

    Really, my point is this: you don't have to like these features. However, that doesn't mean they're not useful. It doesn't mean that they're "dumbed down." It doesn't mean "pros" won't like them. It doesn't mean people who like them don't use their computer as a "real computer" and instead treat it as a "toy." It means you don't like them.





    ipod touch 2g cases. New iPod Cases From Belkin
  • New iPod Cases From Belkin



  • carlos700
    Aug 7, 11:24 AM
    I'd like to see your "Mac" model bumped up past the iMac. I think a lot of people, myself included, would pay a premium for the ability to upgrade. In fact, I wouldn't care if they didn't offer a completely new model as long as they offer some "affordable" manifestations of the Mac Pro. So how's this (and go easy on me here because I rarely delve into the technical aspect of things):

    Eventually (i.e. by November), Core 2 Duo/Woodcrest across he board:

    1) Mac mini: 2 models both with the 1.86 GHz Core 2 Duo
    2) iMac: 2 models with 1.86 GHz and 2.13 GHz Core 2 Duo
    3) Mac Pro: 4 models; 2 Core 2 Duo-based systems (2.40 GHz and 2.66 GHz) and 2 Xeon-based systems (2.80 GHz and 3.0 GHz). The higher-end Xeon systems would sport the same enclosure as the Core 2 Duo systems (similar to the PM G5) but would come in an anodized charcoal black enclosure.

    Any takers?

    -Squire

    Well, most of that looks good except that there is no 2.8GHz Woodcrest.





    ipod touch 2g cases. iPod Touch 2G, iPhone 3G,
  • iPod Touch 2G, iPhone 3G,



  • m-dogg
    Aug 7, 04:06 PM
    Time Machines sounds interesting, though I think I'd have to buy an external drive to ever use it.

    What about Safari? Doesn't sound like there was any reference to this, except related to widgets. I'd love to have more control over tabs, like moving/rerranging thier order, adding a second row of tabs instead of the annoying arrow to see what doesn't fit on one row, moving a tab from one open Safari window to another, tab expose, alerts like Ollie's Tab so you don't accidentally close a window with multiple tabs, and a new unified UI to name a few...





    firestarter
    Apr 12, 03:20 PM
    Anyway, Takeshi Kitano rules. :D

    THIS!

    Just trying to spread the message! ;)





    Sequin
    Apr 11, 02:35 PM
    I don't mind waiting till September, but not till next year. I still have the iPhone 3 and have been putting off getting a new one till 5.





    ssamani
    Sep 13, 07:28 PM
    I have to say that I think a lot of people have missed the point around various software not using all the cores. There is a simple reason. Developing multi threaded apps is hard. And until recently (~1 yr since G5 Quad) developing for more than 2 simultaneous threads (cores or processors) was pretty pointless on a Mac and completely pointless on a PC. Why would a developer bother to develop for more than two thread unless they expect threads to get blocked easily or there to be more than two cores? That's why browsers are one of the few genuine multithreaded apps, rather than 2-4 threads, the threads block easily, so having multiple makes sense. In a lot of cases where there was the opportunity for parallelism using a vector processing unit often makes more sense than multiple threads. Why spend development and testing effort on a solution with no hardware to even test it on, let alone deliver and make use of?

    The whole industry is taking a 90 degree turn and the tools for developing multithreaded applications are not up to scratch. Look at some of the commentary about XBox 360 and PS3 development.

    The dev tools will come, the software will catch up with the hardware, in the meantime just be glad that you can play your stolen MP3's and browse your pr0n without interfering with each other and stop whinging.





    tekmoe
    Sep 19, 07:38 AM
    apple store isn't down yet. I don't expect it today like a lot of people do

    i agree. i think the store would have went down already. next monday has got to be it.





    FF_productions
    Jul 15, 12:54 AM
    Here's hoping you're right. I think including 512 MB of RAM standard would be a bit of a slap in the face if Apple is releasing these supposedly "advanced" machines. What kind of advanced PowerMac has only 512 MB of RAM standard? ;) :cool:

    It would be ridiculous if it came with just 512 mb's of ram...

    Steve Jobs-"The New Octa-Core Mac Pro with 512 mb's of ram" It just doesn't fit...



    0 comments:

    Post a Comment